Marriage of Stott CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 2022E078373California5,445 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/14/22 Marriage of Stott CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re the Marriage of JOSHUA and

GRISEL STOTT.

JOSHUA STOTT,

E078373

Appellant, (Super.Ct.No. FAMSS1900041) v.

OPINION

GRISEL STOTT,

Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Candice Garcia-

Rodrigo, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art VI, §21.) Affirmed.

Joshua Stott, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Westover Law Group and Andrew L. Westover for Respondent.

1 Appellant Joshua Stott (Husband) appeals from the denial of a Request for Order

(RFO) filed by him seeking an order terminating all visits between his two children, B.S.

and A.S. (hereinafter, Minors) and their mother, respondent Grisel Stott (Wife), and

appointment of minor’s counsel. Husband alleged that Wife…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.