Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. City of Petaluma CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 2022A163192California8,569 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 11/14/22 Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. City of Petaluma CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified fo r publi- cation or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or- dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SAVE NORTH PETALUMA RIVER

AND WETLANDS et al.,

A163192

Petitioners and Appellants, v. (Sonoma County CITY OF PETALUMA et al., Super. Ct. No. SCV-266157) Respondents,

J. CYRIL JOHNSON INVESTMENT

CORPORATION,

Respondent and Real Party in Interest.

This is a mandate proceeding to review an agency’s decision for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.1) At issue is the decision of the City of Petaluma (the City) to certify the environmental impact report (EIR) for a 180-unit apartment complex…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.