Salmon
Salmon v. Salmon CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Stephen Salmon (Husband) and Melissa Beth Salmon (Wife) filed competing
requests for domestic violence restraining orders against each other pursuant to the
Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA). (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.)1 The trial
court held a joint hearing on both petitions that included live witness testimony presented
over the course of multiple days. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court issued
an order granting Wife’s petition and denying Husband’s petition. Husband appeals from
this order.
On appeal, Husband does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support
the trial court’s factual findings or to support the issuance of a DVPA restraining order in
favor of Wife. Instead, he challenges only the trial court’s denial of his petition, arguing
(1) the trial court misunderstood the scope of its discretion to the extent it believed
section 6305 constrained its authority to simultaneously grant both requests for protective
orders in this case; (2) even if section 6305 applies, the trial court abused its discretion by
choosing between two identified aggressors in order to grant relief to only one of them;
and (3) the trial…