People v. Clevenger CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2022F082713California3,320 words

Opinion

Opinion

Detjen, J.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioner Susan Diane Clevenger petitioned the superior court, pursuant to former section 1170.95 (now § 1172.6) of the Penal Code,1 for resentencing on her conviction for the murder of Bradley St. Clair (§ 187, subd. (a); count 1). The superior court granted the petition, redesignated the offense on count 1 as kidnapping, and resentenced petitioner on that count. On appeal, petitioner argues: (1) the superior court failed to recognize it had discretion to resentence petitioner on her convictions for kidnapping for ransom (§ 209, subd. (a); count 2) and conspiracy to commit kidnapping for ransom (§ 182, subd. (a)(1); count 3); (2) sentences of life without the possibility of parole on these counts constituted an abuse of discretion and counsel was ineffective in failing to argue for lesser sentences; (3) sentences on two of the three counts must be stayed pursuant to section 654; (4) the court’s failure to order a current or supplemental probation report constituted statutory error and violated petitioner’s due process rights; (5) a victim restitution award in the amount of $171,309.82 constituted an abuse of discretion and must be stricken; and (6) the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.