People v. Jimenez CA4/1

facts for error as mandated by Wende.2 We offered Jimenez the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded. The facts of the

Counsel represents that he has examined the record of conviction and there were no jury instructions on aiding and abetting, felony murder or liability based on the natural and probable consequences theory. 2 underlying offense are set forth in our prior opinion; we will not repeat them here.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the possible issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this case: Whether the trial court erred in denying the petition for resentencing without issuing an order to show cause. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Jimenez on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Jimenez’s petition for resentencing under section 1172.6 is…