In re M.R. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2022C095365California3,597 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/15/22 In re M.R. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

In re M.R. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile C095365 Court Law.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES (Super. Ct. No. AGENCY, STKJDDP20200000125)

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

L.S.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant L.S. (mother) is the mother of the minors, M.R. and P.R. (collectively the minors). Mother contends that the juvenile court erred by (1) denying her request for a bonding study and (2) finding the beneficial parental relationship exception did not

1 apply to prevent the termination of parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 §§ 366.26, 395.) We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.