Thompson

Thompson v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 2022B307969California1,898 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 10/20/22; Certified for Publication 11/16/22 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

NATASHA THOMPSON, B307969 & B311569

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC687511 v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark A. Young, Judge. Affirmed. The Law Office of Cliff Dean Schneider and Cliff Dean Schneider for Plaintiff and Appellant. David Weiss Law, David J. Weiss, Nicholas A. Weiss, and Skyla L. Gordon for Defendants and Respondents. ____________________ Natasha Thompson sued the County of Los Angeles and other county defendants (the County) for removing her son, J.G., from her care. The County demurred. The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend. It found the County was immune from suit and Thompson failed to allege a mandatory duty sufficient to overcome immunity. Thompson appealed (appellate case No. B307969). She says she alleged a mandatory duty and, in the alternative, the court should have allowed her to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.