Hudson

Hudson v. Hudson CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 2022B322589California2,675 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/16/22 Hudson v. Hudson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

DANIEL HUDSON et al., B322589

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 18PR184315) v.

KENNON HUDSON,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Julie A. Emede, Judge. Affirmed. Hopkins & Carley, Steven A. Ellenberg and Ryan D. Cunningham for Plaintiffs and Appellants Daniel Hudson and Michael Hudson. McManis Faulkner, James McManis and Abimael Bastid for Defendant and Respondent. ________________________ Daniel Hudson and Michael Hudson appeal from the probate court’s order denying their petition to enforce the no contest clause in the 2017 Amendment and Restatement of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.