Alston

Alston v. McCormick Barstow CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2022F082618California5,630 words

Opinion

Opinion

Santos, J.

Filed 11/17/22 Alston v. McCormick Barstow CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ERIC ALSTON,

F082618

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 20CECG02657) v.

MCCORMICK BARSTOW LLP, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. D. Tyler Tharpe, Judge. Eric Alston, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP and Todd W. Baxter for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiff Eric Alston, who has been a self-represented litigant throughout these proceedings, sued defendants McCormick Barstow LLP and two of its attorneys, Jessica Boujikian and Anil Pai (collectively, McCormick Barstow), for providing Alston’s mental health records, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.