Santiago

Santiago v. Lamont Elementary School Dist. CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2022F082144California4,458 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/17/22 Santiago v. Lamont Elementary School Dist. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MARY SANTIAGO,

F082144

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-17-100875) v.

LAMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPINION

DISTRICT,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County. Stephen D. Schuett, Judge.

Herr Pedersen & Berglund, Leonard C. Herr, Ronald S. Statler and Caren L. Curtiss for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Parnell Fox and Parnell Fox for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Lamont Elementary School District (defendant) appeals from an order granting a motion filed by Mary Santiago (plaintiff) to strike a posttrial memorandum of costs. Plaintiff’s motion was untimely, but the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.