Loudon

Loudon v. DHSE CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2022B322559MCalifornia3,493 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/17/22 Loudon v. DHSE CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

CLAYTON LOUDON, B322559

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Riverside County Super. Ct. No. v. PSC1703855)

DHSE, INC. et al., ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION

Defendants and Appellants. (NO CHANGE IN THE

APPELLATE JUDGMENT)

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 16, 2022 be modified as follows: At the top of page 2, counsel listing for Plaintiff and Respondent is changed from “GrahamHollis APC, Graham S.P. Hollis, Vilmarie Cordero, Nathan Reese; Irvine Law Group and Rod Bidgoli for Plaintiff and Respondent.” to:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.