Holt

Holt v. Brock

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2022C091636California4,470 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/21/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Nevada) ----

DARRELL L. HOLT, C091636

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CU18-082951)

v.

CHARLES BROCK et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, Thomas M. Anderson and S. Robert Tice-Raskin, Judges. Affirmed.

Gavrilov & Brooks, Ognian Gavrilov, Sheila Wirkus Pendergast, and Eliezer M. Cohen for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Carlson Law Group, Mark C. Carlson, Anne M. Watson, Nathan M. Kelfer, and Steven T. Knuppel for Defendants and Respondents.

1 The trial court in an action to partition real property appointed defendant Charles Brock, a real estate broker, to determine the listing price and sell the property. Plaintiff Darrell L. Holt, one of the real property’s owners, brought this action contending Brock violated fiduciary duties and committed other torts in the performance of his court- appointed role. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Brock, concluding he was protected under quasi-judicial immunity. We affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.