Carroll

Carroll v. Boldt (In re Ehmke)

Good Law
1980 Bankr. LEXIS 5084·4 B.R. 331
United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 1980Bankruptcy No. 79-02431-MCalifornia2,486 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Meyers, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING CLAIM OF HOMESTEAD

I

This matter involves a dispute over whether certain proceeds from the sale of a house are subject to a purported homestead asserted by the bankrupt herein, Ms. Sally A. Ehmke (“bankrupt”). The trustee, Ralph 0. Boldt has objected to the bankrupt’s claim of the homestead, and has been joined in this regard by Mr. Willie R. Carroll, who claims to be a judgment creditor of the bankrupt.

After receiving memoranda on the legal issues confronting the Court, and, after hearing testimony on the factual background of this controversy, the Court has concluded that the bankrupt perfected a valid homestead which now covers the proceeds from the sale of the homestead property. Accordingly, the proceeds are exempt from administration as part of the bankrupt’s estate and are shielded from the claim asserted by Carroll.

*333 II

FACTS

On January 1, 1979, Carroll instituted a civil action against the bankrupt in state court seeking to have a constructive trust imposed upon certain realty then owned by the bankrupt. Five days later, on January 10, 1979, an Interlocutory Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage was entered in state court in an action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.