In re Comark

Good Law
1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6715·49 B.R. 22
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 1985Bankruptcy No. SA 82-03850 RPCalifornia598 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pagter, J.

ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE

The Application of the Trustee to Settle Certain Claims Against the Limited Partners came on for hearing on January 8, 1985. The Trustee appeared in person and was represented by Cynthia Cohen of the law firm of Stutman, Treister and Glatt. Also appearing in support of the compromise was Marvin Greene of the firm of Loeb and Loeb, counsel for the Ad Hoc Comark Limited Partners Protective Committee. James R. Brown of the firm of Jardine, Linebaugh, Brown & Dunn, of Salt Lake City, appeared on behalf of certain limited partners, Daniel H. Willick and Robert Horn of the firm of McKenna, Conner & Cuneo appeared for objecting petitioning creditors; John J. Strumreiter of the firm of Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman appeared for objecting general partner Robert W.. Bell; Richard Broude of the firm of Sidley & Austin appeared for objecting general partner E. Keith Owens, all in opposition to the compromise. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court invited counsel for the trustee to submit a confidential memorandum of reasons for the court’s accepting the settlement which counsel for the trustee would normally be unwilling to make public, absent certainty that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.