Du+rkin

Du+rkin v. Piper Trust Co. (In re Denman & Co.)

Good Law
186 B.R. 707·1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1452·27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1172
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 1995Bankruptcy No. SA 92-12665 JR; Adv. No. SA 94-01292 JRCalifornia2,182 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ryan, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 1, 1990, Piper Trust Company (“Piper”) entered into an agreement with Denman & Co. (“Debtor”) whereby Debtor would administer the assets of the Denman Commingled Bond Fund (the “Denman Fund”). On October 22, 1990, Piper entered into a trust agreement (the “Trust Agreement”) with the State of Florida (“Florida”). Pursuant to Florida’s directions, Piper invested $100,000,000 (the “Florida Assets”) in the Denman Fund. Later, Debtor made four transfers totalling $260,847.66 (the “Transferred Assets”) to Piper. On March 12,1992, Debtor filed for relief under chapter 7 of title 11 of the United States Code §§ 101-1330 (1995) (the “Code”).

On March 30, 1995, Ronald Durkin (“Dur-kin”), the chapter 7 trustee of Debtor’s estate, filed a third amended complaint seeking to avoid and recover the Transferred Assets from Piper (the “Complaint”). On May 22, 1995, Piper filed the motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment (the “Motion”). At a hearing on July 5, 1995, I *709 took the summary judgment matter under submission.

JURISDICTION

This court has jurisdiction over this ease pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (a) (1995) (the district courts shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.