In re Hernandez

Good Law
2001 WL 473861·2001 Bankr. LEXIS 781·262 B.R. 84
United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 2001No. 00-11545California430 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jaroslovsky, J.

Memorandum re Objection to Claim #

Creditor WFS Financial sold the debt- or’s repossessed vehicle 17 days after giving the debtor a statutory notice pursuant to California Civil Code § 2983.2(a), which mandates a 15-day notice period. The debtor has objected to its deficiency claim, alleging that she was entitled to 20 days notice because WFS elected to serve her by mail. Section 2983.2(a) provides, in pertinent part:

In addition, the statute provides that the debtor is not liable for a deficiency unless the notice contained nine items of detailed information. Subsection (6) requires the notice to state “the seller or holder’s intent to dispose of the motor vehicle upon the expiration of 15 days from the date of giving or mailing the notice, or if by mail and either the place of deposit in the mail or the place of address is outside of this state, the period shall be 20 days instead of 15 days, and further, that upon written request to extend the redemption period and any applicable reinstatement period for 10 days, the seller or holder shall without further notice extend the period accordingly.”

*85 It is clear that the notice given by WFS complied with the statute, and that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.