In re Napa Valley Physicians Plan

Good Law
2001 WL 987345·2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1313·266 B.R. 455
United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 2001No. 01-10255California524 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jaroslovsky, J.

Memorandum on Objection to Claim

In this case, claimant Brigid Mulligan seeks allowance of an administrative claim in the amount of $74,632.00. She is the former CEO of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the debtor. The claim is for six months’ severance pay, based on a contract between Mulligan and the subsidiary entered into before the debtor filed its bankruptcy petition. The Chapter 7 trustee objects.

The court sees no basis in law or in equity for Mulligan’s claim. She only worked for a total of ten months, for which she was paid a handsome salary of over $11,000.00 per month. She now wants an additional six months’ pay for doing no work at all, based on a prepetition contract which was never assumed by the debtor. The debtor was not even a party to the contract.

The slim legal basis for the claim is Mulligan’s assertion that the debtor is liable for the salary of employees of its wholly-owned subsidiary. In support of this position, she cites a footnote in a Pennsylvania bankruptcy court case and a provision of the California Labor Code, neither of which remotely supports the assertion. In essence, Mulligan is seeking to pierce the corporate veil without any factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.