In re Valley Health System

Good Law
2008 WL 312101·2008 Bankr. LEXIS 275·381 B.R. 756·49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 164·59 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 490
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 2008No. 6:07-bk-18293-PCCalifornia4,038 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Carroll, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Valley Health System, a California Local Health Care District (“District”) seeks an order finding that appointment of a patient care ombudsman is unnecessary for the protection of patients under the specific facts and circumstances of this case. The United States trustee (“UST”) opposes the request on the grounds that the appointment of a patient care ombudsman is mandated by Congress under § 333(a)(1) of the Code 1 whenever a health care business declares bankruptcy. At the hearing, Gary E. Klausner and H. Alexander Fisch appeared for the District; Christian L. Raisner appeared for SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, and Timothy J. Farris appeared for the UST. The court, having considered the District’s motion and the UST’s opposition thereto, the evi-dentiary record, and arguments of counsel, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law 2 pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 52, as incorporated into Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7052 and made applicable to contested matters by Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9014(c).

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

The District is a public agency formed in 1946 under the State of California Local Healthcare District Law. 3 The District encompasses 882…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.