In re Mohsen

MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL ACCOUNT; FEE APPLICATION OF TRUSTEE’S ACCOUNTANT; AND FEE APPLICATION OF TRUSTEE’S COUNSEL

Before the Court is the final account of chapter 7 trustee Carol Wu (“Trustee”) as well as requests for approval of the first and final fee applications of Trustee’s accountant, Kokjer, Pierotti, Maiocco & Duck, LLP (“Accountant”), and Trustee’s counsel, Goldberg, Stinnett, Davis & Lin-chey (“Counsel”). Debtor, Dr. Amr Moh-sen (“Debtor”), acting pro se, and Debtor’s former chapter 11 counsel, David Levin, Esq. (“Attorney Levin”) both object to the fee applications of Accountant and Counsel. Attorney Levin further objects to Trustee’s fee application.

This Memorandum Decision constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Rule 7052 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

Factual Background

The following factual summary provides an overview of this bankruptcy case to provide context for the pending fee applications. Additional facts pertaining to the various objections to the fee applications are set forth below as necessary to the discussion of a specific objection.

Debtor, who has a PhD. in electrical…