In re City of Stockton

Good Law
2012 WL 7017171·2013 Bankr. LEXIS 533·486 B.R. 194·57 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 140·69 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 28
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 2013Bankruptcy No. 12-32118-C-9; DC No. OHS-5California2,563 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

OPINION REGARDING APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 9019

The question is whether a chapter 9 municipal debtor must obtain court approval under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019 of any compromise or settlement it makes during the course of the chapter 9 case. The City of Stockton says “no.” Its Capital market creditors say “yes.” The answer is: 11 U.S.C. § 904 gives a chapter 9 debtor freedom to decide whether to ignore or to follow the Rule 9019 compromise-approval procedure, but the debtor may need to account for prior compromises during plan confirmation proceedings.

Procedural History

The City of Stockton has agreed to settle a pending damages lawsuit for $55,000.

The capital market creditors, conceding that the settlement is unlikely to flunk Rule 9019 judicial scrutiny under the usual “fair and equitable” standard, contend that the City nevertheless must make a motion under Rule 9019 seeking court approval.

The City’s motion seeks a ruling that Rule 9019 does not apply in chapter 9 cases unless the City elects to consent to judicial scrutiny and, only if Rule 9019 mandatorily applies in chapter 9, to obtain approval of the subject compromise.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.