In re City of Stockton

Good Law
2013 WL 2629129·2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2416·493 B.R. 772·58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 20
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 2013No. 12-32118-C-9California10,976 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

OPINION REGARDING CHAPTER 9 ORDER FOR RELIEF

Chapter 9 is unique among voluntary Bankruptcy Code cases in that a municipality must litigate its way to the order for relief before restructuring its debt. Capital markets creditors of the City of Stockton have required the City to prove its eligibility for chapter 9 relief under 11 U.S.C. §§ 109 (c) and 921(c). Such a proceeding is like a qualifying round in a competition; success leads only to the main event — the process of achieving a viable plan of adjustment. Without a confirmed plan, a municipality lacks constitutional authority to compel impairment of contracts.

This opinion addresses chapter 9 eligibility issues that arose during the three-day trial on the question whether to order relief and the post-trial motion to alter or amend the findings regarding the strategy adopted by certain creditors. The focus is on pre-filing obligations of the municipality in dealing with creditors and stakeholders. Concluding that the City carried its burden to establish the elements required for an order for relief and concluding that the objectors inappropriately used an issue re *777 lating to plan confirmation, but that is irrelevant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.