Diamond

Diamond v. Trawick (In re Trawick)

Good Law
2013 WL 4574533·2013 Bankr. LEXIS 3567·497 B.R. 572
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2013Bankruptcy No. 2:12-bk-12581-RK; Adversary No. 2:12-ap-02039-RKCalifornia7,479 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kwan, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING AND ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTORS’ CLAIM OF EXEMPTION IN MAIN BANKRUPTCY CASE

The disputes between the parties, Stephanie F. Berry (“Berry”) and Jeffrey

Scott Trawick (“Debtors”), and Richard K. Diamond, the Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”), arising from Trustee’s adversary proceeding seeking turnover of certain assets of Debtors claimed as exempt and from the contested matters of Trustee’s objections in the main bankruptcy case to Debtors’ amended claims of exemption for these assets on cross-motions for summary judgment came on for hearing before the undersigned United States Bankruptcy Judge on July 2 and 16, 2013. Kevin D. Meek, of the law firm of Danning, Gill, Diamond & Kollitz, L.L.P., appeared for Trustee. Mark T. Young, of the law firm of Donahoe & Young, appeared for Debtors.

Having considered the moving and opposing papers and heard the arguments of the parties, the court now issues this memorandum decision.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The facts pertaining to these disputed matters are largely undisputed.

On January 24, 2012, Debtors, who are husband and wife, filed a joint voluntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.