Target National Bank v. Nelson (In re Nelson)

Good Law
503 B.R. 466
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2013Bankruptcy No. 6:12-BK-30664-SC; Adversary No. 6:12-AP-01480-SCCalifornia11,806 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Clarkson, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FRBP 9011

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter came on to be heard on November 13, 2013 on the Court’s sua sponte order to show cause (the “OSC”) why sanctions should not be imposed against Weinstein, Pinson & Riley, P.S. (‘WPR”), the attorneys for Target National Bank (“Target”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011. 1 William S. Weinstein, Esq. (“Weinstein”), Josh Harrison, Esq. (“Harrison”), Gail A Rinaldi, Esq. (“Rinaldi”), and an officer from Target, Adam Grim, appeared on behalf of Target.

II. BACKGROUND

Elizabeth Blanche Nelson (the “Debt- or”) filed chapter 7 on September 6, 2012 (the “Petition Date”), and listed an unsecured debt to Target in the amount of $6,659.00, regarding a credit card account with Target (the “Account”). Schedule F, Bk. Dk. I. 2 The Debtor listed $23,927.91 in additional unsecured credit card debt. See Schedule F, Bk. Dk. 1. The Debtor’s statement of financial affairs reflects that she moved from New Jersey to California in February of 2011. SOFA, Bk. Dk. 1. The Debtor’s Schedule B lists “household goods, furniture, furnishings, appliances, stereo, televisions, computer printer” with an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.