In re Grant

Good Law
2014 WL 957343·2014 Bankr. LEXIS 959·507 B.R. 306
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 2014No. 12-19109-A-7California2,253 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Clement, J.

Should the estate pay for unauthorized legal services, albeit services that were valuable, rendered by a law firm that it never hired?

FACTS

Deaunna Grant (“Grant”) was the mother of Robin Grant, a disabled adult. In need of supervision, Robin resided in a care facility operated by Bethesda Lutheran Communities, Inc. (“Bethesda”). While under Bethesda’s supervision, Robin died. Grant retained Wild Carter & Tipton (“Wild Carter”), a law firm, to represent her in connection with Robin’s death but signed no fee agreement at the time.

Later, Grant filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. She did not schedule or exempt her cause of action against Bethesda, and she did not list Wild Carter as a creditor. Sheryl Strain (“Strain”) was appointed the Chapter 7 trustee.

Unaware of Grant’s pending bankruptcy, Wild Carter filed a wrongful death action for Grant in Fresno County, California (the “Bethesda action”). But after learning of Grant’s bankruptcy, Wild Carter entered into a contingency fee agreement with Grant. The agreement created a charging lien to secure Wild Carter’s fee and costs against any recovery obtained.

Shortly after the fee agreement was signed, Strain wrote Wild…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.