In re Licursi

Good Law
2014 WL 5320568·2014 Bankr. LEXIS 4425·521 B.R. 343
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 2014No. 1:10-bk-26168-GMCalifornia4,973 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mund, J.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ON DEBTORS’ MOTION OBJECTING TO SECURED CLAIM OF CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST

One of the principal issues in this case is the amount of the secured claim of California Bank & Trust (CB & T), specifically the sum of attorneys’ fees to which the bank is entitled. So that the Debtors could have an approximate figure to us in their disclosure statement and for purposes of refinancing, the Court prepared a Partial Ruling on Debtors’ Motion Objecting to Secured Claim of California Bank & Trust (dkt. # 4,02). This did not deal with the objections to interest, foreclosure fees, etc. and the Court requested further briefing on those matters, which was re *344 ceived from both sides (dkt. ##4.05, 406). The Debtors also filed Comments on the Partial Ruling along with an analysis and charts (dkt. ##407, 408) and CB & T filed a supplemental brief in support of its response to the objection (dkt. #409).

Having reviewed all of these newly filed papers, the Court hereby issues its final ruling on the objection to claim # 22. The charts created and used by the Court are those attached to the Partial Ruling (dkt. #402). For convenience of the parties, any changes to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.