Jarreau-Griffin
Jarreau-Griffin v. City of Vallejo
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Mueller, J.
ORDER
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for judgment on the plead *830 ings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). ECF No. 56. Also before the court are defendants’ and plaintiffs requests for judicial notice. ECF Nos. 57, 66. Plaintiff 1 opposes and defendants have replied. ECF Nos. 65, 67. This matter is decided on the papers. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is denied.
I. REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Defendants request judicial notice of seven documents related to the City of Vallejo’s (City’s) bankruptcy: (1) the City’s Voluntary Chapter 9 Petition, filed May 23, 2008; (2) the Order Fixing Bar Date for Claims Other Than Those Based on Retiree Health or Pension Benefits; (3) the Second Amended Plan for the Adjustment of Debts of City of Vallejo, California, as Modified August 2, 2011; (4) the Order Confirming City of Vallejo’s Second Amended Plan for the Adjustment of Debts of City of Vallejo, California, as Modified August 2, 2011; (5) the Notice of November 1, 2011 Effective Date; (6) the July 28, 2008 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Stay Entire Action Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 362 in the matter entitled Deocampo v. City of…