B.B.

B.B. v. Grossman (In re Grossman)

Good Law
538 B.R. 34
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 2015Case No. 14-21767-C-13; Adv. Pro. No. 14-02140California3,643 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

Revenge porn comes to bankruptcy. The plaintiff wants a $25,000 judgment debt excepted from the chapter 13 discharge. The judgment was entered in a lawsuit for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress because the debtor-defendant posted on the internet a supposedly-private video showing the parties disrobed and engaged in intimate relations. The question is whether the complaint states a claim for relief under 11 U.S.C. § 1328 (a)(4) for “willful or malicious” conduct. The answer is yes.

Facts

For purposes of this motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the following facts drawn from the First Amended Complaint are assumed to be true.

The plaintiff 1 and defendant lived together in a monogamous relationship for nearly two years. During that time, based on his promise that it would be only for personal use and would remain private, the plaintiff allowed him to make a video showing her nude and engaging in sexual acts with him.

After their relationship had ended and the plaintiff had married someone else, the defendant uploaded the private video on a pornography website, labeling it with the plaintiffs maiden name…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.