In re Tapang

Good Law
2015 WL 6778665·2015 Bankr. LEXIS 3813·540 B.R. 701
United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2015Case No. 11-59479 CNCalifornia5,012 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Novack, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: INTEREST RATE

In this Chapter 11 case, the Court has been asked to determine whether to cram down the interest rate on a loan pertaining to real property located at 523 Burlingame Avenue in Capitola, California (the “Property”). At trial, Esterlita Cortes Tapang (“Debtor”) whs represented by Francisco Aldana, and Creditor 523 Burlingame LLC (“Creditor”) was represented by David Wiseblood. 2 The parties have asked the Court to determine this issue for plan confirmation purposes. This decision determines that the interest rate on Creditor’s secured claim for plan confirmation purposes is 5%.

Debtor’s counsel had advised the Court multiple times that Debtor intended to file a fourth amended plan and disclosure statement once the Court issued a ruling on the. cram down interest rate. Instead, Debtor filed a fourth amended plan and disclosure statement on October 27, 2015. The fourth amended plan provides for an interest rate of 4.25% on Creditor’s loan. Such interest rate is different from the rate Debtor proffered at trial.

Debtor contended at trial that a fixed interest rate of 5%, which consists of a 3.25% prime rate and a 1.75% risk premium, is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.