In re Blanchard

Good Law
2016 WL 806083·2016 Bankr. LEXIS 665·547 B.R. 347·62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 73
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2016Case No. 8:14-bk-14105-SCCalifornia6,359 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Clarkson, J.

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM

Before the Court is the “Application for Payment of Postpetition/Administrative Claim” (“Application”) [Dk. 649] 1 filed by Integrated Financial Associates, Inc. (“IFA”), which came on for hearing on February 4, 2016. Jeremy Richards, Esq. of Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl & Jones LLP appeared on behalf of the Chapter 11 Trustee/Plan Administrator Richard M. Pachulski (“Trustee”). Candace Carlyon, Esq. of Morris Polich & Purdy, LLP appeared on behalf of IFA. Other appearances, if any, were as noted on the record.

Based upon the Application, the declarations of Candace Carlyon, Esq. (“Carlyon Declaration”) [Dk. 651] and William Dyer (“Dyer Declaration”) [Dk. 650]; IFA’s appendix of exhibits (“Appendix”) [Dk. 652]; tbe Trustee’s opposition (“Opposition”) [Dk. 662]; the Trustee’s evidentiary objections (“Evidentiary Objections”) [Dk. 661]; IFA’s reply (“Reply”) [Dk. 692]; and *351 IFA’s response (“Response”) [Dk. 691] to the Evidentiary Objections, and for the reasons set forth on the record and as set forth in detail below, the Application is DENIED. The Evidentiary Objections are SUSTAINED.

I. Introduction

This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.