In re Singh

Good Law
2016 WL 3154008·2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2204·551 B.R. 54
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 2016Case No. 10-28544-E-13California9,088 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sargis, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION DENYING MOTION TO VACATE PREFILING REVIEW ORDER

This court issued a Prefiling Review Order, Dckt. 182, 2 in December 2011 (“Prefil- *56 ing Review Order”), that requires Raj Singh, the Chapter 13 debtor in this case and other prior cases, to obtain authorization to file a new bankruptcy from the chief bankruptcy judge 3 in the district in which Raj Singh seeks to commence a future bankruptcy case during the eight-year period commencing on December 11, 2011. The court’s ruling for issuing the Prefiling Review Order (Civil Minutes, Dckt. 130, “Prefiling Ruling”) discusses in detail the improper conduct of Raj Singh which was the basis for the court determining that it was necessary and proper to issue the Prefiling Review Order.

Raj Singh filed a Motion to Vacate the Prefiling Review Order. Dckt. 209. The court finds that the arguments presented in the Motion to Vacate and stated by Raj Singh at the hearing for the Motion to Vacate are unpersuasive and not credible. Raj Singh continues to ignore the seriousness of his litigation misconduct and the great burden his meritless actions (bankruptcy cases, adversary proceedings, and contested matters)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.