In re Wilkins

Good Law
2017 Bankr. LEXIS 462·564 B.R. 419
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2017Case No. 16-11025-A-13California2,207 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Clement, J.

MEMORANDUM

When calculating a chapter 13 1 debtor’s total unsecured debt for eligibility purposes under § 109(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, should the court include the unsecured portions of undersecured automobile claims? When a court lacks sufficient certainty as to whether such claims may be bifurcated under § 506(a) because of § 1325(a)’s hanging paragraph, then the answer is*no.

I. FACTS

The parties do not dispute the material facts. Chapter 13 debtors Tim M. Wilkins and Cherie R. Wilkins operate several businesses according to their Statement of Financial Affairs (the “SOFA”). These businesses include Sleep Sensations, Inc., and TCJJ, Inc.,

Schedule E/F contains priority unsecured claims and general unsecured claims totaling $332,707. The debtors list four secured claims on Schedule D (the “Secured Claims”). Three of the Secured Claims have motor vehicles as collateral. On their face, each of the Secured Claims appears to have an undersecured component, and they.are described more particularly as follows:

Based on the petition date of March 28, 2016, the date that is 910 days before the petition is September 30, 2013. See 11 U.S.C. § 1325 (a) (hanging paragraph). And…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.