Yahalomey Paz Israel, G.P. v. Wolf (In re Wolf)

Good Law
577 B.R. 327
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 2017Case No.: 1:11-bk-22172-MT; Adv No: 1:12-ap-01016-MTCalifornia10,295 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tighe, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER TRIAL

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Trial in the above-captioned adversary action took place October 2-4, 2017. Plaintiff Yahalomey Paz Israel, G.P. dba/aka Paz Diamonds Israel, an Israel general partnership (“Plaintiff,” “Paz Israel,” or “Paz”) was represented by Nico N. Tabibi, Esq. of the Law Offices of Nico N. Tabibi, APC and Defendant Oded Wolf, Debtor herein (“Defendant,” “Debtor,” or ‘Wolf’), was represented by Stella A. Havkin, Esq. of Havkin & Shrago.

The Court, having considered the Complaint, Answer, subsequent pleadings and discovery, Joint Pre-Trial Order, [Docket No. 117], the evidence and declarations admitted prior to and/or during trial, the live testimony and exhibits admitted at trial, those matters of which the Court took judicial notice, and the entire record, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff is a general partnership organized and existing under the laws of Israel. Plaintiff is a dealer involved in the consignment of fine diamond goods to various persons in the jewelry industry.

2. Wolf Diamonds, Inc., a California corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.