Valle Del Sol v. State of Arizona

Good Law
709 F.3d 808·2013 WL 781704·35 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 201312-15688California8,409 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

Two provisions in Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070 make it unlawful for a motor vehicle occupant to hire or attempt to hire a person for work at another location from a stopped car that impedes traffic, or for a person to be hired in such a manner. These provisions raise First Amendment concerns because they restrict and penalize the commercial speech of day laborers and those who would hire them. Arizona defends the provisions as traffic safety measures, designed to promote the safe and orderly flow of traffic. We acknowledge that Arizona has a real and substantial interest in traffic safety. Arizona, however, has failed to justify a need to serve that interest through targeting and penalizing day labor solicitation that blocks traffic, rather than directly targeting those who create traffic hazards without reference to their speech, as currently proscribed under the State’s preexisting traffic laws. Laws like this one that restrict more protected speech than is necessary violate the First Amendment.

Arizona has also singled out day labor solicitation for a harsh penalty while leaving other types of solicitation speech that blocks traffic unburdened. Arizona defends this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.