P.

P. v. Ramirez CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2013D062658California109 words

Opinion

Mcdonald, J.

BACKGROUND

Ramirez unlawfully possessed a usable quantity of heroin for sale.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

(Wende) and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders).

We granted Ramirez permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not

responded. A review of the record pursuant to Wende and Anders has disclosed no

reasonably arguable appellate issues. Ramirez has been competently represented by

counsel on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

MCDONALD, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

MCINTYRE, J.

2