P.

P. v. Temple CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2013A136772California99 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

We have reviewed the entire record and conclude there are no arguable issues that warrant further briefing. Appellant has not sought to withdraw his plea, and in any event, there is no clear and convincing evidence of good cause to allow him to do so. Appellant was adequately represented by counsel at every stage of the proceedings. The parties stipulated to a factual basis for the plea. There was no sentencing error. There are no issues that require further briefing.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

_________________________ McGuiness, P.J.

We concur:

_________________________ Siggins, J.

_________________________ Jenkins, J.

3