Marathon Funding v. Paramount Pictures CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2013B240723California5,769 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In December 2006, Marathon Funding, LLC, agreed to invest in a slate of 14 motion pictures to be produced and distributed by Paramount Pictures Corporation, including what would become the Oscar winner for best picture in 2007 – “No Country For Old Men” – which starred Tommy Lee Jones and Javier Bardem. Pursuant to that agreement, Paramount issued an accounting statement to Marathon in late 2009 that deducted a little more than $2 million from Marathon‟s account. Marathon later determined that Paramount did so to cover a portion of a $15 million payment Paramount made to Jones due to a drafting error Paramount made in its contract with Jones. Marathon sued Paramount for breach of fiduciary duty, contending that Paramount should not have charged Marathon for Paramount‟s error. The trial court granted Paramount‟s motion to hold a bench trial, not a jury trial, finding that this was the proper course because the gist of Marathon‟s action was equitable in nature. The parties stipulated that no extrinsic evidence would be introduced concerning the formation or interpretation of the investment agreement, and that no extrinsic evidence would be introduced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.