P.

P. v. Tucker CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2013B240236California1,202 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

Filed 3/5/13 P. v. Tucker CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

B240236

THE PEOPLE, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA353803) Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FREDERICK TUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William N. Sterling, Judge. Affirmed.

Tanya Dellaca, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

________________________ This is an appeal from the trial court’s restitution orders following defendant Frederick Tucker’s no contest plea. His plea was the subject of an earlier appeal, case No. B237866, which was dismissed by this court for failure to obtain a certificate of probable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.