P.

P. v. F.B. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2013D062557California312 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

BACKGROUND

The complaint alleged that on May 24, 2012, F.B. assaulted the victim with a

metal broom and committed vandalism causing at least $400 in damage. In July, a

psychiatrist evaluated F.B. and reported she was delusional and unable to carry on a

rational conversation. She exhibited an illogical thought process and behaved in a

bizarre, psychotic manner. She suffered from bipolar disorder and cocaine dependence.

The psychiatrist determined F.B.'s mental disorder required treatment with antipsychotic

medication, she would benefit from the medication, the medication was in her best

medical interest, she lacked the capacity to make decisions regarding the medication,

there were no alternative treatments and the treatment was likely to restore her to

competence. The psychiatrist concluded F.B. did not have an adequate understanding of

the nature of the proceedings against her and could not assist her attorney in a rational

manner in her own defense. He recommended she be referred to a state hospital for

restoration to competency.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.

Counsel presents no argument for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.