P.

P. v. Easley CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2013C066266California6,059 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/5/13 P. v. Easley CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado)

THE PEOPLE, C066266

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. P04CRF0045)

v.

GARY DANIEL EASLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

Following the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5)1, defendant Gary Daniel Easley pleaded no contest to misdemeanor possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) in exchange for deferral of judgment and dismissal of the remaining charges. Defendant was granted deferred entry of judgment (diversion) under the provisions of section 1000 et seq., but thereafter twice admitted failing to comply with the terms of his diversion. Following defendant‟s second

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.