Magallanes

Magallanes v. Bank of America CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2013E054234California3,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/5/13 Magallanes v. Bank of America CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ALEXANDER JOSEPH MAGALLANES

et al.,

E054234

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS915608) v.

OPINION

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. John M. Pacheco,

Judge. Affirmed.

Equity Law Group and Lofty Mrich for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Severson & Werson, Jan T. Chilton, Eric J. Troutman and Amir A. Torkamani for

Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiffs Alexander and Alejandra Magallanes sued defendant Bank of America

for fraud and other alleged causes of action arising from a loan they obtained on their

home and a deed of trust securing the loan. Defendant successfully demurred to the

1 complaint, the first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.