Blackhurst

Blackhurst v. Ungerman CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2013C067415California3,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/5/13 Blackhurst v. Ungerman CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

DAVID A. BLACKHURST, C067415

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2008-00007282-

CU-BC-GDS)

v.

ELISA UNGERMAN,

Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiffs David and Regina Blackhurst, who are spouses, brought the present action against defendant Elisa Ungerman in propria persona.1 They alleged various theories (including legal malpractice) under which they incurred damages as a result of Ungerman‟s representation of them. That representation included a previous action against Regina‟s former employer, and a subsequent dispute arising among Ungerman,

1 We will refer to the Blackhursts by their first names for clarity. No disrespect…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.