Bate

Bate v. Los Angeles County MTA CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2013B238783California1,279 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/5/13 Bate v. Los Angeles County MTA CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

DARI BATES, B238783

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC454192) v.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ramona G. See, Judge. Affirmed. Dari Bates, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Sylvester, Oppenheim & Linde and Alan Varner for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Dori Bates appeals from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to her first amended complaint. The order sustaining the demurrer was with leave to amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.