Riggio

Riggio v. GMAC Mortgage CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2013D061400California5,490 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 3/6/13 Riggio v. GMAC Mortgage CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JAYE RIGGIO et al., D061400

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-0062660-

CU-OR-NC)

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert P.

Dahlquist, Judge. Affirmed.

Appellants Jaye Riggio and John McKenna, also known as Sean McKenna, self-

represented litigants, appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court

sustained without leave to amend the demurrer to their complaint filed against

respondents GMAC Mortgage, LLC (GMAC), MERSCORP, Inc. (MERS)1, The Bank of

In this opinion, MERS refers to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.