P.

P. v. Miller CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2013A135161California1,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

Siggins, J.

I. BACKGROUND

The victim, Miller’s son (Son), was six years old at the time of trial. Miller shared custody of Son with Son’s mother (Mother). Son was staying with Miller on December 14, 2009, and talking with Mother on the phone when he said that Miller “puts his pee- pee in my mouth” and “makes me lick his pee.” Mother called the police and drove to

1 Miller’s home. Officers arrived, spoke with Miller, Mother and Son, and left without making an arrest. Mother went home and left Son with Miller. Son’s preschool teacher (Teacher) testified that Mother called and asked her to talk to Son about the incident. Son told Teacher that Miller put his “pee-pee in my mouth,” and Teacher advised Mother against leaving Son in Miller’s custody. Miller confirmed to Mother that Son’s reports were true, said that he had “random urges,” and that for six months to a year he had been making Son lick his penis. Mother called the police and Miller was arrested on the night of December 16. Miller told the arresting officer that he had a “porn problem” and that, on five occasions, he had Son lick his penis while he was watching pornography and masturbating. In a videotaped interview at the police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.