P.

P. v. Carranza CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2013F064142California886 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/6/13 P. v. Carranza CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F064142

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. VCF178296, v. VCF119158-03)

ARMANDO REYNA CARRANZA, JR.,

OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Gary L. Paden, Judge. Elizabeth Campbell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

-ooOoo-

* Before Cornell, Acting P.J., Gomes, J. and Kane, J. Appellant, Armando Reyna Carranza, Jr., appeals from the denial of his motion to correct his abstract of judgments in case Nos. VCF178296 and VCF119158-03. Following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.