Jimena

Jimena v. Wong CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2013B238763California4,837 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/6/13 Jimena v. Wong CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CARL L. JIMENA, B238763

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MC022432) v.

SAI HO WONG,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Brian C. Yep, Judge. Affirmed.

Carl L. Jimena, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Early, Maslach & O’Shea, John A. Peterson; Law Office of Priscilla Slocum and Priscilla Slocum for Defendant and Respondent.

****** In a second amended complaint, plaintiff and appellant Carl L. Jimena alleged a single cause of action for breach of contract against defendant and respondent Sai Ho Wong (Dr. Wong), seeking damages for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.