Grossman

Grossman v. Capital One Bank CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2013E053925California3,065 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/6/13 Grossman v. Capital One Bank CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MARC GROSSMAN,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E053925

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS908826)

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Barry L. Plotkin,

Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Marc E. Grossman, Brandon J. Carr and Gordon Strange for

Plaintiff and Appellant.

Doll Amir & Eley, Hunter R. Eley and Hemmy So for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant Marc E. Grossman filed a complaint against defendant and

respondent Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A., alleging 10 causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.