Almeida

Almeida v. Antelope Valley Union High School Dist. CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2013B240712California3,370 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/6/13 Almeida v. Antelope Valley Union High School Dist. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

YOLANDA ALMEIDA, B240712

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS133582) v.

ANTELOPE VALLEY UNION HIGH

SCHOOL DISTRICT et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ann Jones, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Office of Diane Goldman and Diane Goldman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sylvester, Oppenheim & Linde and Alan Varner for Defendants and Respondents. Yolanda Almeida (Almeida) appeals from the trial court’s denial of her petition for writ of mandate. Through the writ petition, Almeida sought to set aside a decision of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.