Janet Bell v. City of Boise

Bad Law
709 F.3d 890·2013 WL 828485·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4632
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 201311-35674California5,065 words

Opinion

Opinion

Black, J.

Plaintiffs appeal the court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants City of Boise, Boise Police Department, and Michael Masterson in his official capacity as Chief of Police. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleged Defendants enforced two local ordinances in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution. The court held the Roolcer-Feldmcm doctrine deprived it of subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims for retrospective relief. The court also found Plaintiffs’ claims for prospective injunctive and declaratory relief “largely moot” because the City of Boise amended one ordinance and the Chief of Police issued an internal policy regarding the enforcement of both ordinances.

We reverse the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims for retrospective relief because those claims are not barred by the Rook-er-Feldman doctrine. We also reverse the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims for prospective relief because those claims have not been mooted by Defendants’ voluntary conduct. In reversing, we do not reach the merits of Plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment challenges. Rather, we hold that jurisdiction exists as to Plaintiffs’ Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.