P.

P. v. Edmonds CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2013B244375California597 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/8/13 P. v. Edmonds CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE, B244375

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA084117) v.

FRANK EDWARD EDMONDS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steven R. Van Sicklen, Judge. Dismissed. David L. Polsky, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent. On September 26, 2012, defendant, Frank Edward Edmonds, pled nolo contendere to a felony violation of Penal Code section 69. Defendant, who has filed a notice of appeal, failed to secure a probable cause certificate. We have a duty to raise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.